What Percent Of Gdp Is Financial Services

Marketplace value of goods and services produced within a state

A map of earth economies past size of Gross domestic product (nominal) in USD, Earth Banking company, 2014.^[1]

Gross domestic product (GDP) is a budgetary measure of the marketplace value of all the final goods and services produced in a specific time catamenia by countries.^{[2] [3]} Gross domestic product (nominal) per capita does not, however, reverberate differences in the cost of living and the aggrandizement rates of the countries; therefore, using a basis of GDP per capita at purchasing power parity (PPP) may be more useful when comparing living standards between nations, while nominal Gdp is more useful comparing national economies on the international marketplace.^[4] Full Gross domestic product tin also be broken down into the contribution of each industry or sector of the economic system.^[5] The ratio of Gdp to the full population of the region is the per capita Gdp and the same is chosen Mean Standard of Living.

GDP definitions are maintained past a number of national and international economic organizations. The Organisation for Economical Co-operation and Development (OECD) defines Gross domestic product every bit "an aggregate measure of product equal to the sum of the gross values added of all resident and institutional units engaged in production and services (plus whatever taxes, and minus any subsidies, on products not included in the value of their outputs)".^[vi] An International monetary fund publication states that, "Gross domestic product measures the monetary value of final goods and services—that are bought past the final user—produced in a country in a given flow of time (say a quarter or a year)."^[7]

Gdp is oftentimes used as a metric for international comparisons as well as a wide measure of economic progress. It is often considered to exist the "world'southward near powerful statistical indicator of national evolution and progress".^[8] However, critics of the growth imperative often argue that GDP measures were never intended to measure progress, and leave out cardinal other externalities, such every bit resource extraction, environmental impact and unpaid domestic work.^[9] Critics frequently propose alternative economical models such equally doughnut economics which use other measures of success or culling indicators such as the OECD's Better Life Index as better approaches to measuring the effect of the economy on man development and well being.

History [edit]

Quarterly gdp

William Petty came up with a basic concept of Gdp to attack landlords confronting unfair taxation during warfare between the Dutch and the English betwixt 1654 and 1676.^[10] Charles Davenant developed the method further in 1695.^[xi] The modern concept of Gdp was first adult by Simon Kuznets for a 1934 US Congress report, where he warned confronting its use equally a measure of welfare (run into below under limitations and criticisms).^[12] After the Bretton Forest conference in 1944, GDP became the main tool for measuring a country'due south economic system.^[thirteen] At that time gross national production (GNP) was the preferred guess, which differed from GDP in that it measured production by a country'due south citizens at home and away rather than its 'resident institutional units' (see OECD definition higher up). The switch from GNP to GDP in the Usa was in 1991, abaft backside most other nations. The part that measurements of GDP played in World State of war II was crucial to the subsequent political acceptance of Gross domestic product values as indicators of national development and progress.^[fourteen] A crucial office was played here by the U.s. Section of Commerce under Milton Gilbert where ideas from Kuznets were embedded into institutions.

The history of the concept of Gdp should exist distinguished from the history of changes in many ways of estimating it. The value added past firms is relatively easy to calculate from their accounts, simply the value added by the public sector, by financial industries, and by intangible asset cosmos is more complex. These activities are increasingly of import in developed economies, and the international conventions governing their interpretation and their inclusion or exclusion in GDP regularly alter in an attempt to proceed upwards with industrial advances. In the words of 1 academic economist, "The bodily number for Gdp is, therefore, the product of a vast patchwork of statistics and a complicated set of processes carried out on the raw data to fit them to the conceptual framework."^[xv]

Gdp became truly global in 1993 when China officially adopted it as its indicator of economic operation. Previously, People's republic of china had relied on a Marxist-inspired national accounting system.^[16]

Determining gross domestic product (GDP) [edit]

An infographic explaining how Gross domestic product is calculated in the UK

Gdp can be determined in three ways, all of which should, theoretically, requite the aforementioned result. They are the product (or output or value added) approach, the income approach, or the speculated expenditure approach. It is representative of the total output and income inside an economy

The most direct of the three is the production approach, which sums the outputs of every course of enterprise to go far at the total. The expenditure arroyo works on the principle that all of the product must be bought by somebody, therefore the value of the total production must be equal to people's total expenditures in buying things. The income arroyo works on the principle that the incomes of the productive factors ("producers", colloquially) must exist equal to the value of their production, and determines Gdp by finding the sum of all producers' incomes.^[17]

Production approach [edit]

Too known as the Value Added Arroyo, it calculates how much value is contributed at each stage of product.

This approach mirrors the OECD(Organization for Economical Co-functioning and Development) definition given above.

1. Estimate the gross value of domestic output out of the many various economic activities;
2. Decide the intermediate consumption, i.e., the cost of material, supplies and services used to produce last appurtenances or services.
3. Deduct intermediate consumption from gross value to obtain the gross value added.

Gross value added = gross value of output – value of intermediate consumption.

Value of output = value of the total sales of goods and services plus value of changes in the inventory.

The sum of the gross value added in the diverse economic activities is known as "Gross domestic product at factor cost".

GDP at factor cost plus indirect taxes less subsidies on products = "GDP at producer price".

For measuring output of domestic production, economic activities (i.e. industries) are classified into various sectors. Later classifying economic activities, the output of each sector is calculated by any of the following two methods:

1. By multiplying the output of each sector past their respective market place toll and adding them together
2. By collecting information on gross sales and inventories from the records of companies and adding them together

The value of output of all sectors is and then added to go the gross value of output at factor cost. Subtracting each sector'south intermediate consumption from gross output value gives the GVA (=Gdp) at factor cost. Adding indirect tax minus subsidies to GVA (GDP) at factor price gives the "GVA (GDP) at producer prices".

Income approach [edit]

The 2d fashion of estimating Gdp is to utilize "the sum of principal incomes distributed by resident producer units".^[6]

If GDP is calculated this manner it is sometimes chosen gross domestic income (GDI), or GDP (I). GDI should provide the same amount as the expenditure method described later on. By definition, GDI is equal to GDP. In exercise, however, measurement errors will make the ii figures slightly off when reported by national statistical agencies.

This method measures GDP by adding incomes that firms pay households for factors of product they hire - wages for labour, interest for uppercase, rent for land and profits for entrepreneurship.

The US "National Income and Expenditure Accounts" separate incomes into five categories:

1. Wages, salaries, and supplementary labour income
2. Corporate profits
3. Involvement and miscellaneous investment income
4. Farmers' incomes
5. Income from not-farm unincorporated businesses

These five income components sum to net domestic income at cistron cost.

Two adjustments must be made to become Gross domestic product:

1. Indirect taxes minus subsidies are added to get from factor cost to market place prices.
2. Depreciation (or capital consumption assart) is added to get from internet domestic product to gross domestic production.

Total income can be subdivided co-ordinate to diverse schemes, leading to various formulae for Gross domestic product measured past the income approach. A common one is:

GDP = compensation of employees + gross operating surplus + gross mixed income + taxes less subsidies on production and imports

GDP = COE + GOS + GMI + T_{P & M} – S_{P & M}

• Compensation of employees (COE) measures the total remuneration to employees for work done. Information technology includes wages and salaries, likewise as employer contributions to social security and other such programs.
• Gross operating surplus (GOS) is the surplus due to owners of incorporated businesses. Frequently called profits, although only a subset of total costs are subtracted from gross output to calculate GOS.
• Gross mixed income (GMI) is the same measure out as GOS, just for unincorporated businesses. This often includes most small-scale businesses.

The sum of COE, GOS and GMI is called full factor income; it is the income of all of the factors of production in lodge. It measures the value of GDP at factor (bones) prices. The divergence between bones prices and concluding prices (those used in the expenditure calculation) is the total taxes and subsidies that the regime has levied or paid on that production. And then adding taxes less subsidies on production and imports converts Gdp(I) at factor toll to Gross domestic product(I) at final prices.

Total gene income is too sometimes expressed equally:

Total gene income = employee compensation + corporate profits + proprietor'south income + rental income + net involvement ^[18]

Expenditure approach [edit]

The tertiary way to estimate Gross domestic product is to calculate the sum of the final uses of goods and services (all uses except intermediate consumption) measured in purchasers' prices.^[6]

Market place goods that are produced are purchased by someone. In the case where a good is produced and unsold, the standard accounting convention is that the producer has bought the good from themselves. Therefore, measuring the full expenditure used to buy things is a way of measuring production. This is known as the expenditure method of calculating GDP.

Components of GDP by expenditure [edit]

U.S. GDP computed on the expenditure ground.

GDP (Y) is the sum of consumption (C), investment (I), authorities Expenditures (G) and net exports (X – Chiliad).

Y = C + I + M + (X − One thousand)

Hither is a clarification of each GDP component:

• C (consumption) is usually the largest Gross domestic product component in the economic system, consisting of individual expenditures in the economy (household final consumption expenditure). These personal expenditures fall nether one of the following categories: durable goods, nondurable appurtenances, and services. Examples include food, rent, jewelry, gasoline, and medical expenses, just not the purchase of new housing.
• I (investment) includes, for instance, business investment in equipment, but does not include exchanges of existing avails. Examples include construction of a new mine, purchase of software, or purchase of machinery and equipment for a factory. Spending by households (not regime) on new houses is also included in investment. In contrast to its vernacular meaning, "investment" in Gdp does not hateful purchases of financial products. Ownership financial products is classed as 'saving', as opposed to investment. This avoids double-counting: if one buys shares in a company, and the company uses the coin received to buy plant, equipment, etc., the amount will exist counted toward GDP when the visitor spends the money on those things; to also count it when i gives it to the company would exist to count two times an amount that only corresponds to one group of products. Buying bonds or stocks is a swapping of deeds, a transfer of claims on future product, not direct an expenditure on products; ownership an existing building will involve a positive investment by the buyer and a negative investment by the seller, netting to zero overall investment.
• Yard (government spending) is the sum of government expenditures on final goods and services. It includes salaries of public servants, purchases of weapons for the military and any investment expenditure by a regime. It does non include any transfer payments, such as social security or unemployment benefits. Analyses outside the Us volition often treat government investment as part of investment rather than government spending.
• X (exports) represents gross exports. Gdp captures the amount a country produces, including goods and services produced for other nations' consumption, therefore exports are added.
• M (imports) represents gross imports. Imports are subtracted since imported goods will be included in the terms G, I, or C, and must be deducted to avoid counting foreign supply as domestic.

Annotation that C, I, and G are expenditures on terminal goods and services; expenditures on intermediate goods and services do not count. (Intermediate goods and services are those used by businesses to produce other goods and services within the accounting twelvemonth.^[nineteen]) So for example if a car manufacturer buys auto parts, assembles the car and sells information technology, only the final car sold is counted towards the Gross domestic product. Meanwhile, if a person buys replacement auto parts to install them on their car, those are counted towards the GDP.

Co-ordinate to the U.Due south. Bureau of Economical Assay, which is responsible for calculating the national accounts in the United States, "In general, the source data for the expenditures components are considered more reliable than those for the income components [see income method, higher up]."^[20]

GDP and GNI [edit]

GDP can be contrasted with gross national product (GNP) or, equally it is at present known, gross national income (GNI). The divergence is that GDP defines its scope co-ordinate to location, while GNI defines its scope co-ordinate to ownership. In a global context, globe GDP and world GNI are, therefore, equivalent terms.

GDP is production produced within a state'southward borders; GNI is product produced past enterprises endemic past a country'southward citizens. The ii would be the same if all of the productive enterprises in a country were owned past its ain citizens, and those citizens did non own productive enterprises in any other countries. In practise, however, foreign ownership makes Gross domestic product and GNI not-identical. Production within a country'southward borders, but by an enterprise owned by somebody exterior the country, counts as function of its Gdp simply not its GNI; on the other hand, production by an enterprise located outside the country, but owned by one of its citizens, counts as part of its GNI but not its GDP.

For example, the GNI of the The states is the value of output produced by American-endemic firms, regardless of where the firms are located. Similarly, if a country becomes increasingly in debt, and spends large amounts of income servicing this debt this will be reflected in a decreased GNI but not a decreased Gdp. Similarly, if a country sells off its resources to entities outside their country this will too be reflected over time in decreased GNI, but not decreased Gross domestic product. This would brand the use of GDP more attractive for politicians in countries with increasing national debt and decreasing assets.

Gross national income (GNI) equals GDP plus income receipts from the rest of the world minus income payments to the remainder of the globe.^[21]

In 1991, the Us switched from using GNP to using Gross domestic product as its chief measure out of production.^[22] The relationship betwixt U.s.a. Gdp and GNP is shown in table ane.7.5 of the National Income and Product Accounts.^[23]

International standards [edit]

The international standard for measuring GDP is contained in the book Organisation of National Accounts (2008), which was prepared by representatives of the International Budgetary Fund, European Wedlock, System for Economic Co-operation and Evolution, Un and Globe Bank. The publication is normally referred to as SNA2008 to distinguish it from the previous edition published in 1993 (SNA93) or 1968 (chosen SNA68) ^[24]

SNA2008 provides a set of rules and procedures for the measurement of national accounts. The standards are designed to be flexible, to allow for differences in local statistical needs and conditions.

National measurement [edit]

Countries past Gross domestic product (PPP) per capita (Int$) in 2017 according to the IMF

> $50,000   $35,000 - $50,000   $20,000 - $35,000   $ten,000 - $twenty,000

$5,000 - $10,000   $2,000 - $5,000   < $two,000   No data

Countries by 2019 GDP (nominal) per capita^{[note ane]}

> $lx,000   $50,000 - $sixty,000   $forty,000 - $l,000   $30,000 - $40,000

$xx,000 - $30,000   $10,000 - $20,000   $v,000 - $ten,000   $ii,500 - $v,000

$i,000 - $2,500   $500 - $1,000   < $500   No information

U.South 2015 Gdp computed on the income basis

Within each country GDP is commonly measured by a national government statistical agency, as individual sector organizations normally do not have access to the information required (especially information on expenditure and product by governments).

Nominal Gdp and adjustments to GDP [edit]

The raw Gdp figure as given by the equations in a higher place is called the nominal, historical, or current, GDP. When one compares GDP figures from ane twelvemonth to another, information technology is desirable to compensate for changes in the value of coin – for the furnishings of inflation or deflation. To make it more meaningful for year-to-twelvemonth comparisons, it may be multiplied by the ratio between the value of money in the year the Gdp was measured and the value of money in a base year.

For instance, suppose a country's GDP in 1990 was $100 million and its Gdp in 2000 was $300 million. Suppose also that aggrandizement had halved the value of its currency over that period. To meaningfully compare its GDP in 2000 to its Gross domestic product in 1990, nosotros could multiply the GDP in 2000 by one-half, to brand it relative to 1990 equally a base year. The result would be that the GDP in 2000 equals $300 million × one-half = $150 meg, in 1990 monetary terms. Nosotros would see that the country's Gross domestic product had realistically increased 50 percent over that period, not 200 per centum, as it might appear from the raw GDP data. The Gross domestic product adjusted for changes in money value in this way is called the real, or constant, Gdp.

The gene used to catechumen GDP from current to constant values in this way is called the GDP deflator. Unlike consumer price alphabetize, which measures inflation or deflation in the price of household consumer appurtenances, the Gdp deflator measures changes in the prices of all domestically produced goods and services in an economy including investment goods and government services, besides as household consumption goods.^[25]

Abiding-GDP figures permit us to summate a GDP growth rate, which indicates how much a country'south production has increased (or decreased, if the growth rate is negative) compared to the previous year.

Real GDP growth rate for year n

= [(Real Gross domestic product in year n) − (Real GDP in year n − 1)] / (Existent Gross domestic product in yr n − 1)

Another thing that information technology may be desirable to account for is population growth. If a country'southward GDP doubled over a certain menstruum, but its population tripled, the increase in Gross domestic product may non mean that the standard of living increased for the country's residents; the average person in the country is producing less than they were earlier. Per-capita GDP is a measure to account for population growth.

Cross-border comparison and purchasing power parity [edit]

The level of GDP in countries may be compared by converting their value in national currency according to either the current currency exchange rate, or the purchasing power parity exchange rate.

• Current currency exchange rate is the substitution charge per unit in the international foreign exchange market.
• Purchasing ability parity exchange rate is the commutation rate based on the purchasing ability parity (PPP) of a currency relative to a selected standard (normally the United States dollar). This is a comparative (and theoretical) exchange rate, the just way to directly realize this rate is to sell an entire CPI basket in one country, convert the cash at the currency marketplace charge per unit & then rebuy that same basket of goods in the other country (with the converted cash). Going from land to state, the distribution of prices within the basket will vary; typically, non-tradable purchases will eat a greater proportion of the basket's full cost in the higher GDP country, per the Balassa–Samuelson effect.

The ranking of countries may differ significantly based on which method is used.

• The current exchange charge per unit method converts the value of appurtenances and services using global currency commutation rates. The method can offer meliorate indications of a land'south international purchasing power. For instance, if 10% of Gdp is existence spent on ownership hi-tech strange arms, the number of weapons purchased is entirely governed by current exchange rates, since arms are a traded product bought on the international market. At that place is no meaningful 'local' price singled-out from the international price for high technology appurtenances. The PPP method of GDP conversion is more relevant to non-traded goods and services. In the to a higher place example if hi-tech weapons are to be produced internally their amount will be governed by GDP (PPP) rather than nominal Gdp.

There is a clear pattern of the purchasing power parity method decreasing the disparity in GDP between loftier and depression income (Gdp) countries, equally compared to the current exchange charge per unit method. This finding is called the Penn effect.

Standard of living and Gross domestic product: wealth distribution and externalities [edit]

Gross domestic product per capita is ofttimes used as an indicator of living standards.^[26]

The major advantage of GDP per capita equally an indicator of standard of living is that it is measured ofttimes, widely, and consistently. It is measured frequently in that well-nigh countries provide information on Gdp on a quarterly ground, assuasive trends to be seen quickly. Information technology is measured widely in that some measure of GDP is available for almost every country in the world, allowing inter-land comparisons. Information technology is measured consistently in that the technical definition of GDP is relatively consequent amidst countries.

Gross domestic product does not include several factors that influence the standard of living. In particular, information technology fails to account for:

• Externalities – Economical growth may entail an increment in negative externalities that are non directly measured in GDP.^{[27] [28]} Increased industrial output might grow GDP, simply any pollution is not counted.^[29]
• Non-market place transactions – Gdp excludes activities that are not provided through the marketplace, such equally household product, bartering of goods and services, and volunteer or unpaid services.
• Non-budgetary economy – Gross domestic product omits economies where no coin comes into play at all, resulting in inaccurate or abnormally depression Gdp figures. For example, in countries with major business transactions occurring informally, portions of local economy are not easily registered. Bartering may be more prominent than the use of money, even extending to services.^[28]
• Quality improvements and inclusion of new products – by not fully adjusting for quality improvements and new products, Gross domestic product understates truthful economical growth. For example, although computers today are less expensive and more powerful than computers from the past, GDP treats them equally the same products by only bookkeeping for the monetary value. The introduction of new products is also difficult to measure accurately and is not reflected in Gdp despite the fact that it may increase the standard of living. For example, even the richest person in 1900 could not purchase standard products, such as antibiotics and cell phones, that an boilerplate consumer can buy today, since such mod conveniences did non exist and so.
• Sustainability of growth – Gross domestic product is a measurement of economical historic activeness and is not necessarily a projection.
• Wealth distribution – GDP does not business relationship for variances in incomes of various demographic groups. Come across income inequality metrics for discussion of a variety of inequality-based economical measures.^[28]

It can be argued that GDP per capita as an indicator standard of living is correlated with these factors, capturing them indirectly.^{[26] [30]} Equally a result, GDP per capita as a standard of living is a continued usage considering most people have a adequately accurate thought of what it is and know it is tough to come up with quantitative measures for such constructs as happiness, quality of life, and well-being.^[26]

Limitations and criticisms [edit]

Limitations at introduction [edit]

Simon Kuznets, the economist who developed the first comprehensive ready of measures of national income, stated in his 2d study to the US Congress in 1937, in a section titled "Uses and Abuses of National Income Measurements":^[12]

The valuable capacity of the human mind to simplify a circuitous situation in a compact characterization becomes dangerous when not controlled in terms of definitely stated criteria. With quantitative measurements particularly, the definiteness of the event suggests, ofttimes misleadingly, a precision and simplicity in the outlines of the object measured. Measurements of national income are subject field to this type of illusion and resulting corruption, especially since they deal with matters that are the center of disharmonize of opposing social groups where the effectiveness of an statement is often contingent upon oversimplification. [...]

All these qualifications upon estimates of national income equally an index of productivity are only equally important when income measurements are interpreted from the point of view of economic welfare. But in the latter case boosted difficulties will be suggested to anyone who wants to penetrate below the surface of total figures and market place values. Economic welfare cannot be fairly measured unless the personal distribution of income is known. And no income measurement undertakes to guess the reverse side of income, that is, the intensity and unpleasantness of effort going into the earning of income. The welfare of a nation can, therefore, scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income equally defined above.

In 1962, Kuznets stated:^[31]

Distinctions must be kept in heed between quantity and quality of growth, between costs and returns, and betwixt the short and long run. Goals for more than growth should specify more growth of what and for what.

Further criticisms [edit]

Ever since the development of Gdp, multiple observers accept pointed out limitations of using Gdp every bit the overarching mensurate of economical and social progress. For instance, many environmentalists fence that Gross domestic product is a poor measure of social progress because information technology does not take into account harm to the environment.^{[32] [33]} Furthermore, the GDP does not consider human wellness nor the educational attribute of a population.^[34] American politician Robert F. Kennedy criticized the Gdp as a measure out of "everything except that which makes life worthwhile". He continued to debate that it "does not permit for the health of our children, the quality of their pedagogy or the joy of their play." ^[35]

Although a high or rising level of Gross domestic product is often associated with increased economic and social progress within a country, a number of scholars have pointed out that this does not necessarily play out in many instances. For example, Jean Drèze and Amartya Sen take pointed out that an increase in Gdp or in Gross domestic product growth does non necessarily lead to a higher standard of living, particularly in areas such as healthcare and education.^[36] Another important area that does not necessarily improve along with GDP is political liberty, which is most notable in Communist china, where GDP growth is potent even so political liberties are heavily restricted.^[37]

GDP does non account for the distribution of income among the residents of a country, because GDP is merely an aggregate measure. An economy may be highly adult or growing rapidly, but also contain a wide gap between the rich and the poor in a society. These inequalities often occur on the lines of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or other minority status within countries.^{[ commendation needed ]} This can lead to misleading characterizations of economical well-being if the income distribution is heavily skewed toward the high end, as the poorer residents will non direct benefit from the overall level of wealth and income generated in their country. Even GDP per capita measures may have the same downside if inequality is high. For case, South Africa during apartheid ranked high in terms of Gross domestic product per capita, but the benefits of this immense wealth and income were not shared equally among the country.^{[ citation needed ]} An inequality which the Un Sustainable Development Goal 10 amongst other global initiatives aims to address.^[38]

GDP does not have into account the value of household and other unpaid piece of work. Some, including Martha Nussbaum, argue that this value should be included in measuring GDP, as household labor is largely a substitute for appurtenances and services that would otherwise be purchased for value.^[39] Even under conservative estimates, the value of unpaid labor in Australia has been calculated to be over fifty% of the state's GDP.^[40] A afterwards study analyzed this value in other countries, with results ranging from a depression of nearly 15% in Canada (using conservative estimates) to loftier of nearly 70% in the Uk (using more liberal estimates). For the United States, the value was estimated to exist between about 20% on the low cease to nearly 50% on the high end, depending on the methodology being used.^[41] Because many public policies are shaped by Gdp calculations and by the related field of national accounts,^[42] the not-inclusion of unpaid work in calculating GDP can create distortions in public policy, and some economists have advocated for changes in the way public policies are formed and implemented.^[43]

The UK'due south Natural Capital letter Commission highlighted the shortcomings of GDP in its communication to the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland Government in 2013, pointing out that Gdp "focuses on flows, not stocks. Every bit a event, an economy can run down its assets all the same, at the same time, record high levels of GDP growth, until a point is reached where the depleted avails act as a bank check on future growth". They and so went on to say that "it is apparent that the recorded GDP growth rate overstates the sustainable growth rate. Broader measures of wellbeing and wealth are needed for this and there is a danger that short-term decisions based solely on what is currently measured past national accounts may prove to exist costly in the long-term".

It has been suggested that countries that have authoritarian governments, such as the People's Republic of Red china, and Russian federation, inflate their Gross domestic product figures.^[44]

Research and development about the relation betwixt GDP and use of Gdp and reality [edit]

Shown is how the global fabric footprint and global CO₂ emissions from fossil-fuel combustion and industrial processes changed compared with global GDP.^[45]

Instances of Gross domestic product measures have been considered numbers that are bogus constructs.^[46] In 2020 scientists, equally office of a World Scientists' Warning to Humanity-associated serial, warned that worldwide growth in affluence in terms of Gross domestic product-metrics has increased resources use and pollutant emissions with affluent citizens of the world – in terms of east.g. resource-intensive consumption – being responsible for nigh negative ecology impacts and central to a transition to safer, sustainable conditions. They summarised show, presented solution approaches and stated that far-reaching lifestyle changes need to complement technological advancements and that existing societies, economies and cultures incite consumption expansion and that the structural imperative for growth in competitive market economies inhibits societal change.^{[47] [48] [45]} Sarah Arnold, Senior Economist at the New Economic science Foundation (NEF) stated that "Gross domestic product includes activities that are detrimental to our economy and society in the long term, such as deforestation, strip mining, overfishing and so on".^[49] The number of copse that are net lost annually is estimated to exist approximately ten billion.^{[50] [51]} The global average annual deforested land in the 2015–2020 demi-decade was ten one thousand thousand hectares and the average annual internet forest surface area loss in the 2000–2010 decade 4.vii million hectares, co-ordinate to the Global Forest Resource Cess 2020.^[52] According to one study, depending on the level of wealth inequality, college GDP-growth can exist associated with more than deforestation.^[53] In 2019 "agriculture and agribusiness" accounted for 24 % of the Gdp of Brazil, where a large share of almanac net tropical forest loss occurred and is associated with sizable portions of this economic activity domain.^[54] The number of obese adults was approximately 600 meg (12%) in 2015.^[55] In 2013 scientists reported that big improvements in wellness only lead to modest long-term increases in GDP per capita.^[56] After developing an abstruse metric like to GDP, the Center for Partnership Studies highlighted that GDP "and other metrics that reflect and perpetuate them" may not exist useful for facilitating the production of products and provision of services that are useful – or comparatively more useful – to society, and instead may "really encourage, rather than discourage, destructive activities".^{[57] [58]} Steve Cohen of the Globe Institute elucidated that while GDP does not distinguish between dissimilar activities (or lifestyles), "all consumption behaviors are not created equal and do not have the same impact on environmental sustainability".^[59] Johan Rockström, managing director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Bear upon Inquiry, noted that "it's difficult to meet if the electric current 1000.D.P.-based model of economic growth can go hand-in-manus with rapid cutting of emissions", which nations have agreed to attempt nether the Paris Understanding in guild to mitigate real-world impacts of climate change.^[60] Some accept pointed out that Gdp did non adapt to sociotechnical changes to give a more than accurate picture of the modern economy and does not encapsulate the value of new activities such every bit delivering cost-gratuitous information and entertainment on social media.^[61] In 2017 Diane Coyle explained that GDP excludes much unpaid piece of work, writing that "many people contribute costless digital work such as writing open-source software that tin can substitute for marketed equivalents, and it clearly has nifty economic value despite a price of zero", which constitutes a common criticism "of the reliance on GDP as the measure of economical success" especially subsequently the emergence of the digital economic system.^[62] Similarly Gdp does not value or distinguish for environmental protection. A 2020 report institute that "poor regions' GDP grows faster by alluring more polluting production after connection to China'due south superhighway arrangement.^[63] Gdp may not be a tool capable of recognizing how much natural capital agents of the economic system are building or protecting.^{[64] [ additional citation(s) needed ]}

Proposals to overcome GDP limitations [edit]

In response to these and other limitations of using GDP, culling approaches accept emerged.

• In the 1980s, Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum adult the capability approach, which focuses on the functional capabilities enjoyed past people within a country, rather than the aggregate wealth held within a country. These capabilities consist of the functions that a person is able to reach.^[65]
• In 1990 Mahbub ul Haq, a Pakistani Economist at the Un, introduced the Human Development Index (HDI). The HDI is a blended index of life expectancy at birth, adult literacy rate and standard of living measured as a logarithmic function of GDP, adapted to purchasing ability parity.
• In 1989, John B. Cobb and Herman Daly introduced Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) past taking into business relationship various other factors such equally consumption of nonrenewable resources and degradation of the environment. The new formula deducted from Gross domestic product (personal consumption + public non-defensive expenditures - individual defensive expenditures + capital formation + services from domestic labour - costs of environmental degradation - depreciation of natural capital)
• In 2005, Med Jones, an American Economist, at the International Institute of Management, introduced the first secular Gross National Happiness Index a.one thousand.a. Gross National Well-being framework and Index to complement GDP economic science with additional vii dimensions, including surroundings, education, and government, work, social and health (mental and physical) indicators. The proposal was inspired by the King of Bhutan'due south GNH philosophy.^{[66] [67] [68]}
• In 2009 the European Matrimony released a communication titled GDP and beyond: Measuring progress in a changing globe ^[69] that identified five deportment to amend indicators of progress in means that brand them more responsive to the concerns of its citizens.
• In 2009 Professors Joseph Stiglitz, Amartya Sen, and Jean-Paul Fitoussi at the Committee on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (CMEPSP), formed by French President, Nicolas Sarkozy published a proposal to overcome the limitation of GDP economics to expand the focus to well-being economic science with a well-being framework consisting of health, environment, work, concrete safety, economical safety, and political freedom.
• In 2008, the Middle for Bhutan Studies began publishing the Bhutan Gross National Happiness (GNH) Index, whose contributors to happiness include physical, mental, and spiritual health; time rest; social and customs vitality; cultural vitality; education; living standards; good governance; and ecological vitality.^[70]
• In 2013, the OECD Better Life Index was published by the OECD. The dimensions of the alphabetize included health, economic, workplace, income, jobs, housing, civic engagement, and life satisfaction.
• Since 2012, John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs accept edited an annual Earth Happiness Written report which reports a national measure of subjective well-existence, derived from a single survey question on satisfaction with life. Gdp explains some of the cross-national variation in life satisfaction, but more than of it is explained past other, social variables (Encounter 2013 Earth Happiness Written report).
• In 2019, Serge Pierre Besanger published a "GDP three.0" proposal which combines an expanded GNI formula which he calls GNIX, with a Palma ratio and a set of environmental metrics based on the Daly Rule.^[71]

Lists of countries by their GDP [edit]

• Lists of countries by Gross domestic product
• List of countries by Gdp (nominal), (per capita)
• List of continents by Gross domestic product (nominal)
• List of countries by Gdp (PPP), (per capita)
• Listing of countries by existent Gross domestic product growth charge per unit, (per capita)
• Listing of countries by Gross domestic product sector limerick
• List of countries past past and projected GDP (PPP), (per capita), (nominal), (per capita)

See besides [edit]

• Economic growth
• OECD Better Life Alphabetize
• Chained volume serial
• Circular menstruum of income
• GDP density
• Genuine progress indicator
• Gross regional domestic product
• Gross regional production
• Inventory investment
• Modified gross national income
• Listing of countries by boilerplate wage
• Dispensable household and per capita income
• Listing of economic reports by U.South. government agencies
• Misery alphabetize (economics)
• National average salary
• Potential output
• Productivism
• Social Progress Alphabetize

Notes [edit]

1. ^ Based on the IMF data. If no data was available for a country from IMF, data from the Globe Banking concern is used

References [edit]

1. ^ "Gross domestic product (Official Exchange Rate)" (PDF). World Bank. Retrieved 24 August 2015.
2. ^ "Finance & Development". Finance & Development | F&D . Retrieved 23 February 2019.
3. ^ "Gross Domestic Product | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)". world wide web.bea.gov . Retrieved 23 February 2019.
4. ^ Hall, Mary. "What Is Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)?". Investopedia . Retrieved 23 February 2019.
5. ^ Dawson, Graham (2006). Economic science and Economic Change. FT / Prentice Hall. p. 205. ISBN0-273-69351-iv.
6. ^ ^{a b c} "OECD". Retrieved fourteen August 2014.
7. ^ Callen, Tim. "Gross Domestic Product: An Economy'due south All". IMF. Retrieved three June 2016.
8. ^ Lepenies, Philipp (2016). The Ability of a Unmarried Number: A Political History of GDP. New York: Columbia University strategy-3-1-33252415-37392257_9257a4574cf75f9d33bf6a486ecb145d these measures affects in greater extent, the GDP will already exist drastically afflicted by the health crisis the world is experiencing by COVID-19, which will reduce these expectations.
9. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics : seven means to think like a 21st-century economist. London. ISBN978-1-84794-138-one. OCLC 974194745.
10. ^ "Petty impressive". The Economist. 21 December 2013. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
11. ^ Coyle, Diane (vi Apr 2014). "Warfare and the Invention of Gross domestic product". The Globalist . Retrieved 1 Baronial 2015.
12. ^ ^{a b} Congress commissioned Kuznets to create a system that would mensurate the nation'southward productivity in gild to better understand how to tackle the Bang-up Depression.Simon Kuznets, 1934. "National Income, 1929–1932". 73rd U.s.a. Congress, 2d session, Senate certificate no. 124, folio 5-seven Simon Kuznets, 1934. "National Income, 1929–1932". 73rd US Congress, 2d session, Senate certificate no. 124, page 5-7 Simon Kuznets, 1934. "National Income, 1929–1932". 73rd Usa Congress, second session, Senate document no. 124, folio v-7. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/971
13. ^ Dickinson, Elizabeth. "GDP: a brief history". ForeignPolicy.com. Retrieved 25 April 2012.
14. ^ Lepenies, Philipp (April 2016). The Ability of a Single Number: A Political History of Gross domestic product. Columbia University Press. ISBN9780231541435.
15. ^ Coyle, Diane (2014). Gdp: A Brief just Appreciating History. Princeton Academy Printing. p. 6. ISBN9780691156798.
16. ^ Heijster, Joan van; DeRock, Daniel (29 Oct 2020). "How GDP spread to China: the experimental improvidence of macroeconomic measurement". Review of International Political Economy: 1–23. doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1835690. ISSN 0969-2290.
17. ^ World Banking company, Statistical Manual >> National Accounts >> GDP–final output Archived 16 April 2010 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved Oct 2009.
    "User'south guide: Groundwork information on GDP and GDP deflator". HM Treasury. Archived from the original on 2 March 2009.
    "Measuring the Economic system: A Primer on GDP and the National Income and Product Accounts" (PDF). Bureau of Economical Analysis.
18. ^ U.s.a. Agency of Economical Analysis, "A guide to the National Income and Product Accounts of the U.s." (PDF). , page five; retrieved November 2009. Some other term, "concern current transfer payments", may exist added. Likewise, the document indicates that the capital consumption adjustment (CCAdj) and the inventory valuation adjustment (IVA) are applied to the proprietor's income and corporate profits terms; and CCAdj is applied to rental income.
19. ^ Thayer Watkins, San José Land Academy Section of Economics, "Gross Domestic Production from the Transactions Tabular array for an Economy", commentary to starting time table, " Transactions Tabular array for an Economic system". (Page retrieved November 2009.)
20. ^ Concepts and Methods of the United States National Income and Product Accounts, chap. two.
21. ^ Lequiller, François; Derek Blades (2006). Understanding National Accounts. OECD. p. 18. ISBN978-92-64-02566-0. To convert Gross domestic product into GNI, information technology is necessary to add together the income received by resident units from abroad and deduct the income created by product in the country but transferred to units residing abroad.
22. ^ United States, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Glossary, "Gross domestic product" Archived 29 January 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved Nov 2009.
23. ^ "U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economical Analysis". Bea.gov. 21 Oct 2009. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 31 July 2010.
24. ^ "National Accounts". Primal Agency of Statistics. Archived from the original on sixteen April 2011. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
25. ^ HM Treasury, Background information on Gross domestic product and Gross domestic product deflator
    Some of the complications involved in comparing national accounts from different years are explained in this Earth Banking concern certificate Archived xvi June 2010 at the Wayback Machine.
26. ^ ^{a b c} "How Exercise Nosotros Measure Standard of Living?" (PDF). The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
27. ^ Mankiw, Northward. Thou.; Taylor, M. P. (2011). Economics (2nd, revised ed.). Andover: Cengage Learning. ISBN978-ane-84480-870-0.
28. ^ ^{a b c} "Macroeconomics - Gdp and Welfare". Retrieved 21 February 2015.
29. ^ Choi, Kwan. "Gross Domestic Product". Introduction to the Earth Economy.
30. ^ "How Real Gross domestic product per Capita Affects the Standard of Living". Study.com.
31. ^ Simon Kuznets. "How To Approximate Quality". The New Democracy, 20 October 1962
32. ^ van den Bergh, Jeroen (13 April 2010). "The Virtues of Ignoring GDP". The Banker.
33. ^ Gertner, Jon (13 May 2010). "The Ascent and Fall of Grand.D.P.". New York Times Mag. Archived from the original on 2022-01-02.
34. ^ "What Are the Advantages & Disadvantages of the GDP in Macroeconomics?". Bizfluent . Retrieved 2021-05-07 .
35. ^ Suzuki, Dabid (February 28, 2014). "How the Gdp Measures Everything 'Except That Which Makes Life Worthwhile'". EcoWatch . Retrieved May 5, 2021. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
36. ^ Drèze, Jean; Sen, Amartya (2013). An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions. Princeton: Princeton University Printing. ISBN9781400848775.
37. ^ "China Land Report Freedom in the World 2012". freedomhouse.org. 19 March 2012. Archived from the original on 17 May 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2016.
38. ^ "Goal 10 targets". UNDP. Archived from the original on 27 Nov 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2020.
39. ^ Nussbaum, Martha C. (2013). Creating capabilities : the human development approach. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Printing of Harvard University Press. ISBN978-0674072350.
40. ^ Blades, François; Lequiller, Derek (2006). Agreement national accounts (Reprint ed.). Paris: OECD. p. 112. ISBN978-92-64-02566-0.
41. ^ "Incorporating Estimates of Household Production of Non-Market place Services into International Comparisons of Material Well-Beingness".
42. ^ Holcombe, Randall G. (2004). "National Income Bookkeeping and Public Policy". Review of Austrian Economics. 17 (4): 387–405. doi:x.1023/B:RAEC.0000044638.48465.df. S2CID 30021697.
43. ^ "National Accounts: A Practical Introduction" (PDF).
44. ^ Ingraham, Christopher (15 May 2018). "Satellite data strongly suggests that China, Russian federation and other disciplinarian countries are fudging their GDP reports". SFGate. San Francisco. Washington Post. Retrieved 16 May 2018.
45. ^ ^{a b} Thomas Wiedmann; Manfred Lenzen; Lorenz T. Keyßer; Julia Steinberger (19 June 2020). "Scientists' warning on affluence". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:ten.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. PMC7305220. PMID 32561753. Text and image were copied from this source, which is available nether a Artistic Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
46. ^ Pilling, David (four July 2014). "Has GDP outgrown its employ?". www.ft.com . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
47. ^ "Abundance is killing the planet, warn scientists". phys.org . Retrieved 5 July 2020.
48. ^ "Overconsumption and growth economy key drivers of environmental crises". phys.org . Retrieved v July 2020.
49. ^ "Why GDP is no longer the nearly effective measure of economic success". www.worldfinance.com . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
50. ^ "Earth has iii trillion copse but they're falling at alarming rate". Reuters. ii September 2015. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
51. ^ Carrington, Damian (four July 2019). "Tree planting 'has mind-blowing potential' to tackle climate crisis". The Guardian . Retrieved 26 May 2020.
52. ^ "Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020". www.fao.org . Retrieved 26 May 2020.
53. ^ Koop, Gary; Tole, Lise (i October 2001). "Deforestation, distribution and evolution". Global Environmental Alter. 11 (iii): 193–202. doi:ten.1016/S0959-3780(00)00057-one. ISSN 0959-3780. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
54. ^ Arruda, Daniel; Candido, Hugo Chiliad.; Fonseca, Rúbia (27 September 2019). "Amazon fires threaten Brazil's agribusiness". Scientific discipline. 365 (6460): 1387. Bibcode:2019Sci...365.1387A. doi:ten.1126/science.aaz2198. PMID 31604261. S2CID 203566011. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
55. ^ Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, Lee A, Marczak L, Mokdad AH, Moradi-Lakeh 1000, Naghavi M, Salama JS, Vos T, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Ahmed MB, Al-Aly Z, Alkerwi A, Al-Raddadi R, Amare AT, Amberbir A, Amegah AK, Amini E, Amrock SM, Anjana RM, Ärnlöv J, Asayesh H, Banerjee A, Barac A, Baye E, Bennett DA, Beyene AS, Biadgilign S, Biryukov South, Bjertness Eastward, Boneya DJ, Campos-Nonato I, Carrero JJ, Cecilio P, Cercy Thou, Ciobanu LG, Cornaby Fifty, Damtew SA, Dandona L, Dandona R, Dharmaratne SD, Duncan BB, Eshrati B, Esteghamati A, Feigin VL, Fernandes JC, Fürst T, Gebrehiwot TT, Gold A, Gona PN, Goto A, Habtewold TD, Hadush KT, Hafezi-Nejad N, Hay SI, Horino Thou, Islami F, Kamal R, Kasaeian A, Katikireddi SV, Kengne AP, Kesavachandran CN, Khader YS, Khang YH, Khubchandani J, Kim D, Kim YJ, Kinfu Y, Kosen Southward, Ku T, Defo BK, Kumar GA, Larson HJ, Leinsalu 1000, Liang X, Lim SS, Liu P, Lopez Ad, Lozano R, Majeed A, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Mazidi M, McAlinden C, McGarvey ST, Mengistu DT, Mensah GA, Mensink GB, Mezgebe HB, Mirrakhimov EM, Mueller UO, Noubiap JJ, Obermeyer CM, Ogbo FA, Owolabi MO, Patton GC, Pourmalek F, Qorbani One thousand, Rafay A, Rai RK, Ranabhat CL, Reinig N, Safiri Due south, Salomon JA, Sanabria JR, Santos IS, Sartorius B, Sawhney Thousand, Schmidhuber J, Schutte AE, Schmidt MI, Sepanlou SG, Shamsizadeh M, Sheikhbahaei S, Shin MJ, Shiri R, Shiue I, Roba HS, Silva DA, Silverberg JI, Singh JA, Stranges S, Swaminathan S, Tabarés-Seisdedos R, Tadese F, Tedla BA, Tegegne BS, Terkawi Equally, Thakur JS, Tonelli Thou, Topor-Madry R, Tyrovolas Due south, Ukwaja KN, Uthman OA, Vaezghasemi K, Vasankari T, Vlassov VV, Vollset SE, Weiderpass E, Werdecker A, Wesana J, Westerman R, Yano Y, Yonemoto Due north, Yonga M, Zaidi Z, Zenebe ZM, Zipkin B, Murray CJ (July 2017). "Wellness Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years". The New England Journal of Medicine. 377 (1): 13–27. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1614362. PMC5477817. PMID 28604169.
56. ^ Ashraf, Quamrul H.; Lester, Ashley; Weil, David Due north. (2009). "When Does Improving Health Raise GDP?". NBER Macroeconomics Annual. 23: 157–204. doi:10.1086/593084. ISSN 0889-3365. PMC3860117. PMID 24347816.
57. ^ "Social Wealth Index". The Middle for Partnership Studies . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
58. ^ Gansbeke, Frank Van. "Climate Alter And Gross Domestic Production – Need For A Drastic Overhaul". Forbes . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
59. ^ "Economic growth and environmental sustainability". phys.org . Retrieved 20 September 2020.
60. ^ Landler, Marking; Sengupta, Somini (21 January 2020). "Trump and the Teenager: A Climate Showdown at Davos". The New York Times . Retrieved twenty September 2020.
61. ^ Kapoor, Amit; Debroy, Bibek (4 October 2019). "Gross domestic product Is Not a Mensurate of Human Well-Being". Harvard Concern Review . Retrieved 20 September 2020.
62. ^ "Rethinking Gdp -- Finance & Development, March 2017". world wide web.imf.org . Retrieved twenty September 2020.
63. ^ He, Guojun; Xie, Yang; Zhang, Bing (ane June 2020). "Expressways, Gdp, and the surround: The case of China". Periodical of Development Economic science. 145: 102485. doi:ten.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102485. ISSN 0304-3878. S2CID 203596268. Retrieved twenty September 2020.
64. ^ "GDP is destroying the planet. Here'south an alternative". World Economic Forum . Retrieved 20 September 2020.
65. ^ Shahani, Severine Deneulin; Lila (2009). An Introduction to the Human Evolution and Capability : Approach (1st ed.). London: Earthscan Ltd. ISBN9781844078066.
66. ^ "Gross National Happiness (GNH) - A New Socioeconomic Development Policy Framework - A Policy White Paper - The American Pursuit of Unhappiness - Med Jones, IIM". Iim-edu.org. 10 January 2005.
67. ^ "Happiness Ministry building in Dubai". 11 February 2016.
68. ^ "Harvard Kennedy School Report to United states of america Congressman 21st Century GDP: National Indicators for a New Era" (PDF).
69. ^ "Gross domestic product and across: Measuring progress in a changing globe". European Union. 2009. Retrieved 26 February 2012.
70. ^ "Bhutan GNH Index"
71. ^ "Death by GDP - how the climate crisis is driven by a growth yardstick". The Straits Times. 21 Dec 2019.

Further reading [edit]

• Australian Bureau for Statistics, Australian National Accounts: Concepts, Sources and Methods, 2000. Retrieved November 2009. In depth explanations of how Gross domestic product and other national accounts items are adamant.
• Coyle, Diane (2014). GDP: A Brief merely Affectionate History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN978-0-691-15679-8.
• Joseph E. Stiglitz, "Measuring What Matters: Obsession with one financial figure, GDP, has worsened people'southward health, happiness and the surroundings, and economists want to supervene upon it", Scientific American, vol. 323, no. 2 (August 2020), pp. 24–31.
• Us Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, "Concepts and Methods of the Usa National Income and Product Accounts" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 November 2017. Retrieved nine March 2018. . Retrieved November 2009. In depth explanations of how GDP and other national accounts items are adamant.

External links [edit]

Global

• Australian Agency of Statistics Manual on GDP measurement
• GDP-indexed bonds
• OECD Gdp chart
• UN Statistical Databases
• Earth Development Indicators (WDI) at Worldbank.org
• World GDP Chart (since 1960)

Data

• Bureau of Economical Analysis: Official U.s. GDP data
• Historicalstatistics.org: Links to historical statistics on Gross domestic product for countries and regions, maintained past the Department of Economic History at Stockholm University.
• Quandl - GDP by country - downloadable in CSV, Excel, JSON or XML
• Historical U.s.a. Gross domestic product (yearly data), 1790–nowadays, maintained by Samuel H. Williamson and Lawrence H. Officer, both professors of economics at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
• Google – public data: Gdp and Personal Income of the U.Due south. (annual): Nominal Gross Domestic Product
• The Maddison Project of the Groningen Growth and Development Middle at the University of Groningen, the netherlands. This project continues and extends the piece of work of Angus Maddison in collating all the available, credible data estimating GDP for countries effectually the world. This includes data for some countries for over 2,000 years back to ane CE and for essentially all countries since 1950.

Articles and books

• Gross Domestic Product: An Economic system'southward All, International Monetary Fund.
• Stiglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi J-P. Mismeasuring our Lives: Why GDP Doesn't Add Up, New Press, New York, 2010
• What's wrong with the Gross domestic product?
• Whether output and CPI inflation are mismeasured, by Nouriel Roubini and David Backus, in Lectures in Macroeconomics
• Rodney Edvinsson, Edvinsson, Rodney (2005). "Growth, Accumulation, Crunch: With New Macroeconomic Data for Sweden 1800–2000". Diva.
• Clifford Cobb, Ted Halstead and Jonathan Rowe. "If the Gdp is upward, why is America down?" The Atlantic Monthly, vol. 276, no. 4, October 1995, pages 59–78
• Jerorn C.J.Yard. van den Bergh, "Abolishing GDP"
• Gdp and GNI in OECD Observer No246-247, Dec 2004-Jan 2005

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_product

Posted by: reyeswherestants1985.blogspot.com

Share this post